![[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand Non-examining physicians v](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_1024x1024_2x_2d000ff1-b222-4c16-b617-3861e33c5449.webp?v=1753464283)
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25
Non-examining physicians v
Social Security Ruling 19-2p
EAJA - reasonableness of hours - briefing time
2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors
[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand Non-examining physicians v[Angela S.] v. OMalley, No. CV 23 22441 (RK), 2024 WL 4563910 (D. N. J. Oct. 24, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert Kirsch) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and court decision Topics addressed: Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions articulation requirements RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Sentence six remands due to new evidence Ruling addressed:
