Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands Failure to follow treatment

Failure to follow treatment

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief

Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9)

Medical opinions - articulation requirements

Nikita M. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2024) - interacting with supervisors, medical opinions, subjective complaints, lay evidence, sentence 6 remands Failure to follow treatmentNikita M. v. OMalley, No. 2: 23 CV 10722 (D. N. J. Feb. 21, 2024) (Order by U. S. Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and the public Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions articulation requirements Testimony of lay witnesses Subjective symptoms regulatory factors Subjective symptoms required finding Mental domains interacting