Curtis P. v. O’Malley (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2025) - due process violation: scheduling then cancelling remand hearing without notice, plaintiff opposed remand and successfully sought remand for an award of benefits 2) The ALJ’s finding that

2) The ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff can perform the exertional demands of light work is not supported by substantial evidence

the ALJ again failed to properly evaluate the medical opinion evidence as directed by this Court

RFC - ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his or her conclusion

Checklist of arguments to make in your cases

Curtis P. v. O’Malley (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2025) - due process violation: scheduling then cancelling remand hearing without notice, plaintiff opposed remand and successfully sought remand for an award of benefits 2) The ALJ’s finding thatCurtis P. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 24 3288 SVH (D. S. C. Feb. 5, 2025) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Shiva V. Hodges, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Response to Motion to Remand (seeking payment of benefits); Opinion remanding for a calculation of benefits Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC assistive device Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Weight of VA disability finding Vocational