Helen K. v. Kijakazi (C.D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023) - cognitive impairment, failure to include credited opinion, lay evidence CV 22-55 CAS (MRW) (C

CV 22-55 CAS (MRW) (C

3) The residual functional capacity finding is the product of a lay evaluation and is not supported by substantial evidence

3)  The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting the lay evidence from Mrs

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief and court decision

Helen K. v. Kijakazi (C.D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023) - cognitive impairment, failure to include credited opinion, lay evidence CV 22-55 CAS (MRW) (CHelen K. v. Kijakazi, Case No. 2: 21 cv 09711 KES (C. D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Joint Stipulation and Memorandum Opinion and Order Topics addressed: Specific impairments stroke Specific impairments cognitive limitations RFC failure to include credited opinions Medical opinions (new law) persuasiveness RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC need for special supervision